SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Denice who wrote (5214)9/12/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: Puppy Dawg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Denice,

One would find it hard to argue with an article so wonderfully written. While I believe Clinton should not have lied I understand why he did. The first and foremost question that stills weighs heavily on my mind is: Did we have the right to ask this question in the first place? Next he should have refused to answer such a private question in public. Third, when he did answer the question it should have been the truth.

To answer your first question... Of course there was right to ask him that question. It was asked to show a precedence in a lawsuit with Paula Jones. You know the own he was accused of Sexually assaulting.

I find it very hard to believe that any woman would defend this creep, knowing how he treats women.

Pup



To: Denice who wrote (5214)9/12/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 13994
 
>.Did we have the right to ask this question in the
first place? Next he should have refused to answer such a private question in public. Third, when he did answer the question it should have been the truth.


The Supreme ruled 9-0 that the Jones suit should go forward. Your argument is with the Dems and feminists who created that right to seek damages and compel such testimony and with the man that lied under oath and abused his office to cover it up.

They are the unholy trinity that are responsible for Clinton's eternal disgrace.