Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Barry Grossman who wrote (64597)	9/12/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: StockMan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Please dont post TO ME what some IDIOT at the NY Times thinks. Perjury means Clinton BELIEVED he was Lying (MANY WELL KNOWN LAWYERS SAY HE IS RIGHT). And there was nothing in the case that shows that he believed that. Even now Clinton claims he is LEGALLY ACCURATE (Unfortunately the IDIOT at the NY Times doesn't know what it means). As for Starr, HE SHOULD BE HELD SERIOUSLY ACCOUNTABLE FOR PUBLISHING A SEX STORY, in the HOPE OF TARNISHING THE REPUTATION OF SOMEONE. HE PUBLISHED MONICA'S (with a vivid imagination) STORY. STARR ENTRAPPED CLINTON into an alleged perjury, Constantly LEAKED information to the PRESS to tarnish someones reputation and finally published a SEX STORY. The Dude Starr should be IMPEACHED IMO.