Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PAT JENNING who wrote (322)	9/12/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

>> Asking Clinton about a consensual relationship in a sexual harassment case is par to exploring the victim's sexual history in a rape case. It is irrelevant. That's what the judge ruled before she threw the whole Jones case out. Wrong. Starr asked the judge to remove the Lewinsky matter from the Jones case because it was interfering with his investigation. She agreed, saying that it was, for now, non-essential. She said she was not ruling on its materiality at the time. Since that time Judge Wright has warned that Clinton's perjury has left him open to being held in contempt. She is deciding that issue. Further, the Jones case looks like it may be reinstated because of Clinton's perjury and recent court rulings.