Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (64604)	9/12/1998 6:03:00 PM
From: StockMan	Respond to of 186894

Hey Mary, MONICA had fun. She enjoyed it, there is more to enjoyment than Sexual gratification. Too bad there are so many PRUDES around. Stockman

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (64604)	9/12/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary, re: "I am outraged" Me too, but for different reasons. My most important issue is that we live in a world where two different trends have merged to create what I consider an uncivilized, rude and destructive intrusion into the privacy of citizens. First, there is a feeling that because someone has dedicated their life to public service, their entire private life is subject to investigation, including having a professional prosecutor and his staff spend 4 1/2 years looking into every aspect of his life. I don't know how many folks would stand up to that level of scrutiny. Second, the ability and willingness (of self-serving politicans and officers of the court) to share the unpleasant details of a personal transgression with the world, without rebuttal. This capability, in the hands of a real tyrant with real power (Joseph McCarthy comes to mind), is scary. I don't feel at all comfortable with the present situation, but I am more concerned by what this portends for the future. As to your feelings about Clinton and his actions, I respect your opinions, and really don't want to debate all the legal BS, or the many unproven suppositions. It goes to my previous point that it's not really a discussion that I believe people should be having on a public web site. Everyone will have a different opinion based on their mindset, I could try to debate you point by point but I suspect we wouldn't change each others minds. At any rate, I think the country is a little less civilized and honorable, a little less "free" today than it was yesterday. That was the point I was most trying to make, and I'm sorry that I got you more "worked up". John

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (64604)	9/13/1998 2:35:00 AM
From: Jules B. Garfunkel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary, John and All, The question is, what consequences do you think this will this have on INTC, and the rest of the stock market, over the next couple of weeks? Jules

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (64604)	9/13/1998 4:16:00 AM
From: carl a. mehr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary, Re: - " Bill Clinton had sex in the work place with an intern. The workplace happens to be paid for and maintained by taxpayers. Not only that, but it is the Oval Office. I can't begin to describe what this means." I think it means that the Oval Office should be torn down and rebuilt! I must be cleansed of all the horny karma that is hanging around. The Starr Report is a very detailed masterpiece; hope it does the job. humble carl