SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: the Druid who wrote (27634)9/12/1998 6:39:00 PM
From: Joss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Hi Druid,

Do not confuse broken campaign promises with lying under oath...big difference (though I condone neither and Bush paid in the next election).

Steve



To: the Druid who wrote (27634)9/12/1998 7:22:00 PM
From: Wildstar  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 94695
 
>Read my lips: No ...

I guess according to your standard
Pres. Bush should have been investigated.<

Did Bush lie under oath?



To: the Druid who wrote (27634)9/13/1998 2:10:00 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
OT

I guess according to your standard
Pres. Bush should have been investigated.


He was trown out of office in elections for that, even that his policies brought us very prosperous time.

Clinto had nothing to do with it.

AG and Rubin and their "friends" masterminded this great recovery.

Umjustified the American people asume it was Clinton, but he made no headways in teh economic state of the world or other international policies were his influence were more direct.

Hillary made a lot for woman rights and other isues and Al Gore pushed for a long needed enviromental reform.

Bill Clinton has done ZILCH, IMHO just walked around "Presidential"

BWDIK

Haim