Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: llamaphlegm who wrote (17034)	9/13/1998 2:46:00 AM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 164684

I've gotten a few private messages tonight about my post, so I think I'll post my responses for you, too. This thread should be renamed "Popular Misconceptions and the Delusions of Shorts". Anything pro-Amazon is taken as a lie, a conspiracy or a misconception. While no one can put a hard number to an appropriate hard valuation for Amazon, the collective "you" have taken your anti-Amazon bias to hysterical extremes. It's a frenzy. I got fed up with the agenda here. There is no discussion here, just piling-on. It's boring. When Glenn (who has no experience with the principals) came back with that "Let's get an unbiased source," my first impulse was to tell him to f*ck off. It's a waste for me to spend any time here. The collective "you" have no respect for any opposing voice or research, no matter how qualified, but at the same time it's no problem for you to practice fabrication and theory, which is impossible to deal with here. Anyone playing a dangerous stock like this should be open-minded and flexible. "You" have your chips spread all over the table but your opinions are inbred. Like I said...you deserve one another. Feed your opinions from Amazon's critics, each other, and from the press. It's all you can tolerate, but you should be practicing more care. It's real money for me.