Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robert read who wrote (27643)	9/12/1998 8:14:00 PM
From: Wildstar	Respond to of 94695

>So, it is ok to lie if it is not under oath.< No, but lying under oath is much more serious, with him being the chief law enforcement officer. Lying under oath IMO is an impeachable offense.

To: robert read who wrote (27643)	9/12/1998 8:46:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 94695

robert, did thomas leave stains on anita's dress? w/o that little piece of info clinton would continue to deny this relationship with monica and he wouldn't be in this predicament. did reagan lie? i don't know. did thomas lie? i don't know. did clinton lie? imho, absolutely. under oath? absolutely. is that a felony? absolutely. are the republicans any better? some are some aren't. are their politics better? i'm scared of both parties politics, actually. they are both very self serving - their route is very different.