Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Questions only? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kid Rock who wrote (308)	9/13/1998 2:57:00 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3811

Has anyone threatened noncompliance? Don't you realize my question was really about the dominant and submissive netherworld of sexual proclivities, and not strictly about sentences ending with question marks ONLY? Can we be so bold as to CAPITALIZE our letters, incidentally? And can I go to bed now, because I am tired, fun that this is?

To: Kid Rock who wrote (308)	9/13/1998 1:08:00 PM
From: George S. Montgomery	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3811

Don't you have to admit that certain infiltrators, not working in the spirit of the medium, Emile is a prime and universal example, can lower the character of, and damage the structure of, a thread? Have you read enough ot the initial posts to this thread, Questions?, to see that such infiltrators were beginning to gnaw at its fibers - with sexual conquest at the content end, and quasi-questions at the form end? Shouldn't they be chastened? Punished for the Good of the State? Would you support me if I proposed that retaliation should not exceed, in pain or penalty, that of light and loving (cunning, a la Pure, I believe) lingual lashings - which seem to fall within the favored themes of several of the distaff among us - and suchforth? Why not? Editing PS: Will you forgive the above impudence if I allow that I thought I was addressing Grainee rather than the Segnior?