Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (558)	9/13/1998 5:05:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

>>Alan Dershowitz has already stated that this falls far far short of an impeachable offense.<< alan dershowitz also argued that oj was "not guilty." do you believe alan on oj? if not, why do make him seem like some kind of high road guru? if you do believe him on oj, then, hey, what can i say? ;-)

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (558)	9/13/1998 8:35:00 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1533

The author of the report is starting to look like he went way over the line of decency in his effort to smear the President. Some people I work with, who by the way dont like Clinton, feel this way. They anxiously awaited this report and when they saw the content and sleaze factor involved they were disgusted and I think embarrassed. The division head went to the supplies closet and brought back a case of wine that was leftover from one of the recent parties, everybody got a bottle of wine if they agreed not to read the report. (there is a slight relevance of this report on the net and my company, as it is an internet hardware vendor). Anyway because of this I havent read the report. I guess I would consider the people I work with to be included in you backlash group. Releasing a report that was this sleazy and with no other content was a very bad judgement call on Starrs part. Im glad they dont want him at Pepperdine. Michelle

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (558)	9/13/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: James R. Barrett	Respond to of 1533

Well Johnathan you sure make it clear that you want Clinton to remain in office for two more years. I also want him to stay in office but for different reasons. 1. I want to see him be the butt of 10,000 jokes for two more years. 2. I want to laugh at him every time he makes a speech. 3. I want to laugh at him when he goes to church. 4. I want to see the democratic congressional candidates run away from him. 5. I want to hear Hillary tell us how much she loves Bill without gagging. 6. I want to watch Bill "feel HIS pain". 7. I want to watch the slow death of a man who loves power and then suddenly discovers he has none. Yes Johnathan, it will be a delightfully funny two years if Bill and Hillary stay in the White House. Bill will be weaving baskets and Hillary will be patting him on the head and telling him what a great job he's doing. Monica will be living on the French Riviera spending her millions from book sales, sucking on a big cigar and thanking Bill for giving her the opportunity to have the good life. Cheers, Jim