Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (TRBDF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (1971)	9/13/1998 4:08:00 PM
From: Mike C2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3458

Really A@P, show just a bit class & maturity! Here's part of your self-description Investment Style NASDAQ short seller and Corporate Investigator Experience 11 Years as a NASDAQ licensed principal and Market Maker I don't make my living trashing companies for profit. I resent your faulty judgments. You have, evidently, some personal experience in the business. In your first post on the thread you said: 1848 <I plan on making the trip this weekend [to the Mexican facility] and since I live in North San Diego County it should be a short trip. > We're still waiting for your report. Why don't you impress us with some corporate investigation? I don't think "staple onto engines" quite makes it. <This guy Halimi is as reliable as the Canadian promoters who he deals with are.> 1851<This one seems to have plenty of hypability due to the sales they do have and the absolute confusion surrounding the electric device they staple onto engines.> 3460 from Tokyo Joe's Cafe: <TRBD is a scam> SI: Mr. Pink's Picks: selected ev (#2761/2903) 1953 <BY the way I wanted to know if anyone noticed that TRBD's announcemnt was worded to sound like they had struck a deal with WASTE Management > And you are calling me paranoid? :) SI: Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (#1955/1971) 1968 <If you own a few of these shares you could be thinking great I have a legitimate shot at making some money.. If you are short you are thinking a few guys who on the surface appear to be honest but who really don't have any experience in competing in such a major league game are destined to get crushed couple that along with the dilution which is growing at an enormous rate and you have a safe bet.. Reality lies between the two and hard facts show that Turbo-pac is a worthless ntechnology that will not be incorporated on any large scale any limited success in Cal;ifrnia will not be reproduced elsewhere and will not continue for long...a one product company cannot usually succe4ed for long> I asked some legitimate questions about how stocks trade. You were a trader. Why don't you add to our knowledge or understanding? Oh, I forgot. You're short and have an investment into shaking out the longs. Never mind. If you were serious about this issue you could have found a way up to Santa Barbara to speak with company principals. I think we know about all we need to about who you are and what you represent. MikeC