Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aleta who wrote (13914)	9/13/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

My response to your post Aleta is the same as it was on Yahoo/ESVS: It truly amazes me how sometimes you can make such perfect common sense, and then all of a sudden stray into territory that makes me think you're a resident in the Deep Space Nine space station where so many kinds of humanocreatures co-exist. First off, I'm highly appreciative of your supporting remarks concerning Mkingsle's intimidation. My reponse is simple and rooted in a statement I've made in the past: I'm not going to take his bum trip! His actions are his own actions; and mine are mine. I'm comfortable with where I'm at; it's up to him to be comfortable with where he's at. Whatever his motivation--I can't account for it--he went too far. But he's gone off the beaten path before only to come back OK. I hope once again he comes back OK. No, I'm not reporting him. He can be his own judge. But relative to his statement that Hayton was in Palm Springs? Well, that simply cannot be a true remark. The only way in which I can account for such a contradictory remark, if what he says is true, is someone in the Zulu office thought Hayton returned to his home in Palm Springs, unaware of the fact that Hayton returned to his home in Newport. When you've got the money to travel and you have several homes, leaving the office saying, "I'm going home," can leave one with less than certain information. I'm confident my reporting to you about our Friday morning meeting will be verified. I've no doubt about this. Now, Aleta, here's how you get to Deep Space Nine. A Hayton imposter?!? That's really funny and a well-rooted paranoic position. I provided a vivid description of what Hayton looks like. He also handed me a "Draft 1" copy of the press release that went out that very morning, and asked if I had yet seen it on the wires. So, nope. Nice try. Hell of a reach. But this man I met was no Hayton imposter. No imposter would have the knowledge of the company that this man had. I find even your raising this possibility as comical, at best, particularly given your own experience. Regarding my feelings toward you and your contact with Hayton? Wrong! Terribly wrong! You're conveniently forgetting the clear fact that I was one of your defenders (see my past ESVS/Yahoo posts near that time period) when everyone jumped on you, when you reported that you and Hayton had a conversation. I never doubted you. And, even funnier is your implication that I was jealous that he contacted you, and not myself? There you go again, you're out there in that Deep Space Nine world. The fact is I encourage positive relationships among each participant on this thread, including you, whether you recognize it or not. Why not, here now, simply admit you don't see me in a positive light and that this dates back to when I--perhaps too harshly-- ruffled your feathers when you were posting negatively and parroting Wired and other negative posters? In any event, once again, I thank you for your kind remarks regarding the Mkingle incident. I'm perfectly willing to accept you for who you are; but you are not at all willing to accept me for who I am. And that's a that. In conclusion, I'm absolutely appalled no one, including you, has taken the time to contact the Boston hotel (617/262-9600) to verify Hayton's presence, where room and telephone records (he also did a lot of faxing) would verify his presence.

To: aleta who wrote (13914)	9/13/1998 2:44:00 PM
From: Brady B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Whatever happened between Party and "Hayton" Friday is between them. It is "NO" way to contact investors or conduct investor relations in general. It was Party's perogative to post the information that he and "Hayton" shared over coffee. I am sure he posted this as a "by the way" sort of thing. However, if "Hayton" did this knowing and counting on Party posting the information, then again I say it is very poor business/investor etiquette on "Hayton's" and the company's part. I damned sure wouldn't share any conversations I had with Hayton on any board. I may PM those who requested my opinion but that would be the extent of it. For God's sake Hayton, you have a good IR firm in Sitrick, let them do their job. Why do you want to stir up a mess like this. I am beginning to think it is your form of entertainment. If you (Hayton) are going to have private sit downs with investors, then tell them not to post it publically. Privately, OK, but not publically. It only causes problems, annnnnd I think you know that. Am I angry because he didn't contact me? LOLOLOLOLOLOL No way man! The way things have been handled at ZULU/ESVS, I wouldn't beleive anything I was told. With the way this stock has been performing on promised information I would probably do just the opposite of what that information told me to do. What this company needs to do is address all the issues publically in a straight forward manner. If they don't have the information, then they should say so. They don't need to beat the bush by saying they are working on it. Four words. "WE DON'T HAVE IT". If they do have it and have failed to release it, then they should state the reason they don't want to release it. Like Jack Nicholson would say, "The freakin' truth man. The freakin' truth." IMO: We are never going to find out fully what transpired during the first 3/4 of 1998.

To: aleta who wrote (13914)	9/14/1998 1:12:00 AM
From: Terry T.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

With the mythical P.H.'s periodic surfacings, the new PR firm will be short-lived I am afraid. I suspect he may be one of the biggest loose cannons around, one who sometimes trains the cannon on himself. LOL. Loved the mythical P.H.'s comment about Netscape, which I thought had been the single largest account for Zulu and one touted in its Foundation Buy materials on the website. P.S. While I disagree with your position on PartyTime, he should do what I did - take a week away from this thread. It becomes compulsive, obsessive, repetitive, etc. Life and this thread will go on, with or without us.