Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Healthcare.com Corporation (Nasdaq: HCDC)was [HDIE] -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew H who wrote (3695)	9/13/1998 10:55:00 PM
From: MeDroogies	Respond to of 15094

Hardly a nasty and misleading habit. Anyone who considers Starr's report a pornagraphic work CLEARLY indicates, by that thought process, that they choose to ignore the REALITY of the illegality that took place. He lied, under oath, in a deposition, in the Paula Jones case. Then, when investigated further, he continued to lie and obstruct. That you focus on the sex shows what you are interested in...either the sex itself OR the fact that you voted for a man who has let you down, and this is the only way you can rationalize your way out. Do you REALLY buy his explanation that he was confused by the concept of "a sexual relationship"? He's a Baptist, and they haven't come to his support. He went to Georgetown, and as far as I know, the Catholics haven't come to his support. Why? Because his definition doesn't match theirs. And he knew what he was saying. And he knew that he was lying. He is a lawyer. He was under oath. He knows the consequences. Now that you know he's a liar, aren't you at all concerned about what else he has lied about? If not, then you really don't care about the direction this country has taken. And don't try and blame "people like me" for the direction it's taken. I, for one, have never cared for Clinton. I have also never cared about the "sex stuff". I have never cared for those who have attacked him at every turn, because he HAS done SOME good things (NAFTA, for example). But overall, he has only done things that he felt would benefit him and his. I don't trust anyone who has NEVER held a job in the private sector. It means he's beholden to someone or many people, and you'll never know exactly who these people are. Oh yeah, as for that "nasty habit"...I notice you don't take potshots at those people who use the polls to support their viewpoints (there are a few on this thread). Surely, that is an equally nasty habit, in your view?