SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2666)9/13/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
You wrote:

How are the editorials in the Economist on this issue? I have the economist here, theres a lot in there about Clinton. I didnt read it because I thought it would not be unbiased.

And I responded on point.

Btw, most say that resignation is not in the Rep's interests. Most say that an impotent president Clinton who stays is in their interests.

I think the country's interests takes precedence. That means nothing less than removal.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2666)9/13/1998 2:28:00 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Michelle,

You must not have spoken to anyone who voted in the most recent CNN Poll(about 1PM today). When asked if Pres. Clinton should stay on as President, 62% answered Yes.

Ann



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2666)9/13/1998 5:09:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Respond to of 67261
 
Michelle, there is a local guy here who is running for Congress. He's been running radio ads that state that the candidate is for "truth in government", and the ad doesn't even mention the current President. Seems pretty reasonable to me. I'm for it (truth in government) and I bet a lot of other people are too. I think the guy is smart (he is a physician).