Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moneysmith who wrote (641)	9/13/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

>>and that impeachment is favoured only if he orchestrated a coverup; we really don't have exhaustive evidence of that yet Wrong. If he lied under oath or asked others to lie or tampered with witnesses. There is exhaustive evidence (445 pages and 2000 of testimony). It is foolish to suggest Clinton didn't lie under oath. The best guess for them trying to maintain that farce is that they know he's a goner and are trying to keep him out of jail. So while there is exhaustive evidence, there just isn't exhaustive understanding yet. Don't worry, the hearings will drive it home. I want to see the Dems summon Monica or Betty to give testimony. I doubt they dare. Btw, 60% now believe Paula Jones and only 16% believe Clinton.

To: Moneysmith who wrote (641)	9/13/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

You obviously don't know what misdemeanor meant to our founder's. It meant misdeed back then. Still does but from the following definition from Webster's the first definition is the most common today. Main Entry: misúdeúmeanúor Pronunciation: -di-'mE-n&r Function: noun Date: 15th century 1 : a crime less serious than a felony 2 : MISDEED Back when we were under British rule one of the unjust practice's of British law was that you could be criminally convicted of commiting a "misdeed" which was not specifically prohibited under law. That is how Salem convicted and burned their "witch's". The term used for this type of criminal prosecution was "High crimes and misdemeanours". Our constitution specifically prohibits this for criminal procecution which risk's the citizen of "life and limb" which means imprisonment or death. This is still allowed under civil trials since the penalty is only monetary. Also it was specifically allowed for impeachment and would have been allowed in any case since the only punishment is removal from office. So he may be impeached for the sex alone if congress so vote's. In fact they have impeached a judge about a century ago for profanity. Don't remember who.