Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (645)	9/13/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: Les H	Respond to of 1533

CUC International

To: Mama Bear who wrote (645)	9/13/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: Robert Skinner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

Set up concubine office for the white house. Ok so this is not about sex. Then what is this about then? Is it about a President lying, is it about a cover up? Or is it about the the battle between the sexes? Or maybe it's about a president's sexual drive. Or is it about how a woman uses sex? I think the President should be allowed to have sex. There should be a special concubine office for the white house. After all sex is a genetic biologic driving force behind men. In this case because of the political / social taboos connected with sex the duties of the President were distracted. I think the American people would have been better served if the President could have relationships free of scrutiny beyond national security interest. So in the future women like Lewinsky could be dealt with by the office of White house concubines. That should help them get ahead (punn intended)