Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : LastShadow's Position Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: freelyhovering who wrote (341)	9/13/1998 7:26:00 PM
From: LastShadow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43080

Stock Splits and Nets I have never, ever seen a reverse split that did any good for the price of a stock, and I would doubt that SYQT will be an exception. Bummer, as I have 3k shares of that, too. Nets - yes, that is one of the trading strategies I use. Its is based on some relationships between indicators that I discovered over time. Telling anyone what the indicators are isn't as simple as "using 39 period stochastic, or this MACD with that TRIX". I run the pattern matching/learning algorithms on a separate machine, then feed a mathematical formula to the package I displayed. Its not a static search per se. I have to run it every day and every time I use it. And the whole process takes a while. I can drop a stock onto a few of the nets and see what kind of return it could have generated, but to give an update or forecast requires a lot more than than. For example, IOM, SYQT and UTI are all showing as buys per the nets i ran. however, only UTI and QNTM made the list after I ran them through the rest of the analysis - the reason is that the performance of IOM was poor historically and made more bad calls then good ones - therefore my confidence in the net being right was low and it wasn't added to the list. so I guess the short answer is "yes", and "I can't tell you." lastshadow