Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bmart who wrote (5164)	9/13/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

...arbitration results 'must' be agreed to by both sides, or ...they go to court.. WellRich has indicated that it will now seek a "court compel" order, as I posted earlier. Is it that you don't pay attention, or are you really incapable of doing anything but repeating the information bgtit feeds you?

To: bmart who wrote (5164)	9/13/1998 9:18:00 PM
From: Diver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

bs-artist: You are not understanding the law at all, if I may be of assistance, arbitration results 'must' be agreed to by both sides I think you are quite lax in your understanding of arbitration. Agreements / Contracts between parties (and don't go giving me that - "there was no contract between AZNT and Wellrich crap".... I don't care..that's not the point). Arbitration is usually agreed to before hand as a contract clause, or in the event of a disagreement agreed to as a framework for resolution. In any event, you can't be "tricked" into arbitration. The only relevant point is, was there an understanding between the parties that they would accept arbitration to settle any differences? Any law that applies would be contract law, unless Nevada is a state that prohibits arbitration. Anyway, why don't we all go read this? adr.org No need to respond, sir Diver