SELL! SELL! SELL! GET OUT NOW!!! HURRY!!!
>>> You would think my posts read like the above if you read the responses -- lighten up!!! GG is huffing and puffing as he clicks on the above. <<<
SS - this message is for you - everyone else - beat it --.... is "SS" ok w/ you?? Your name is a tongue-twister - were you in "Alien." :)
All the "paraphrases" below may not appear co-herent; every time I think of something over the next hour or so, I'll type it without much regard to "how it goes together."
SS - part of me wants to "believe"
I am not your enemy. Don't forget, we are all in the same boat at this point in time.
Of anyone posting on this board, you are by far the one who has done the most research, plus you are fair. Even setting up a website -- hello!! - you are the goods. After this is "all over" you should set yourself up as a promoter, like Wallstreetwest.com.
If anyone deserves a break, it is you. I think about you and your interests when I write my "negative" posts recently, and I try to make as much of an effort to be objective as possible.
I am not out to "pop your balloon" - just want to steer it around the pins and needles.
If anyone should want to own a VBroady dart board by now it should be you, but you don't get childish and name-call, etc., you have class.
I am new to SI - haven't set up a personal profile, yet. In a nutshell, I started a company in 1984 (telecom) with about $44, was living in a VW van for six months, etc.; now my company is ranked the sixth largest telecom company in Oregon per the Oregon Business Journal.
Fourteen years of hard work, but also a "good time."
Not a broker, or a stock-basher --how much could I make doing this? - could I work out of my home? -- kidding!!!
I disagree with you on some points, andI must say that I am highly skeptical of IDCN and sometimes "one-sided." I would be less this way if I would see some more objective, not necessarily negative, "what if" comments on this board. Everyone is in la-la land.
I don't WANT to be the bad guy. I want to be in la-la land, too. Nothing would make me happier to say "you're right," so we can move on to high profits, together.
My experience is, however, that when everyone is having "happy thoughts" and not being cautious, bad things happen with stocks - people are caught off-guard - with unexpected events.
You have succeeded in changing my mind on some of the most important issues, i.e., you have me believing that IDCN is not fraudulent. My opinion on this is reversed. This is a big win for you - to your credit. I am trusting your experience with these people on a personal level.
I do, however, believe that IDCN has not worked with CMI/investors in good faith. This is a major worry for me. People jump ship on worries like these more than bad earnings, etc, trust is a big obstacle.
Lack of one-on-one contact with who you are "doing business with" makes stock investing frustrating for me, especially when compounded by these doubts. You have talked to these people on the phone, by mail, etc - many times, right?
Do they (Jeff, Papa, other IDCN people pulling the strings) really impress you as straight-shooters? Was your first contact with them on Aug 10-12, or were you in on this stock earlier? How much more do you know about their history -- past successes, if any. They don't have to be perfect - who is? - not asking them to be saints.
Explain to me further the essay/tesing process and how controlled it is - are their any chances for this process to be "manipulated" in any way. (Yes - I have a nagging belief it is in their best interest to do this -- although highly unethical -- to drop the price for their 10M on short term, etc.) -- convince me that they are above any "high-jinks."
Tell me about Jeff and Papa in particular, as well as any other major players, like the .04 - 4-Mill investor ... how much do you know??
I care as much about the people involved as I do about the land itself.
Please don't tell me that how a news report is worded is not critical -- this is controlled by IDCN. One stock I had last year pulled this trick. News can be great, and sound bad. They can have a great dig and not report it right away; a good one, and hold the news, etc.
Without my input this weekend, this board would have little in the way of doubt regarding the future of IDCN. It is one thing to be positive and another to not accept that this is not a "sure thing."
I do believe it will fall significantly in the short - two week - term. Why? Backlash over the "buy-out" decision reversal and stockholders not wanting to risk a poor report -- aren't a very high percentage of priliminary tests negative in the first place??
We disagree, at least for now, however, I trust your knowledge and motives. Plus I wouldn't have to read about betting pools and nudy bars and other non-IDCN related stuff if I just stuck to reading your posts.
Good luck to you SS .... I do hope you the best with IDCN and your other investments.
Thanks, ESPN TNN |
