SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (5523)9/13/1998 8:33:00 PM
From: Scrapps  Respond to of 13994
 
I have no great like or dislike for Ken Starr, however, I don't understand the contempt against him for doing his job and leaving no stone untouched. Was he supposed to withhold facts?
Ranting on...
If anyone can show me where Starr and not congress decided to place the report on the Internet...please do.
And if anyone thinks the Starr Report is outrageous...turn on a TV in any house in America.
I see reports that 5 of the largest newspapers have called for him to step down, one is in Philly.

As Arlo said in Alice's Restaurant: "It could be a movement".



To: Who, me? who wrote (5523)9/13/1998 10:54:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Respond to of 13994
 
thanks for posting that summary of editorials, who me. Lots of variation as to attitude, with some blaming the law (as personified in Ken Starr). But what is striking is that the best defense that the most lenient of editorials could mount for Clinton is that they feel the report is too graphic....too graphic in its presentation of acts committed by our President!!

I wonder if any of them saw the irony of that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News