Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cool who wrote (5527)	9/13/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

I would not want to go to a school where he is a Dean cause he seems to have more interest in sex than business. Will there be cameras in dorm rooms, will students who skip a class be investigated at all cost till they divulge their sex lives.

To: cool who wrote (5527)	9/13/1998 10:19:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13994

dc, I promise that this tearing apart of a duly appointed law official, Janet Reno, will come back to haunt you. It was President Clinton's personal decision to appoint her, and now you tar and feather her when you debase her decision to direct Kenneth Starr to move ahead at all speed in inquiring into the question of Presidential perjury and obstruction of justice. Starr was ordered by Janet Reno to do so. Your Billy boy is truly a monumental screw-up. Fortunately he did appoint at least a couple of law officers with some sense of upholding their sworn oaths to enforce the laws of the land.

To: cool who wrote (5527)	9/14/1998 2:38:00 PM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Yo Cool- <<I picture Starr and his team of investigators questioning Monica about the details, their brows perspiring, ferverously taking notes, imaginations on fire,--remember that Sharon Stone movie when she crossed her legs and all the detectives leaned forward to get a better look? Has anyone taken a close look at Starr's team?>> I suspect the only imagination on fire here is yours. Why you think you have any right to smear someone based on that imagination is beyond me. Guess your type believes in blaming the messenger for the message. Perhaps Starr should have put a figleaf around his report so you could enjoy your phony, sanitized view of Sleazebag Bill? Better, IMO, he should have simply reported what he learned during the course of his investigation. Only the dimwitted can now believe that the focus of Clinton's culpability is in sex. Right now, perjury and obstruction of justice loom as greater problems for him and those who defend him. Not to mention lying to the American people for no more elevated reason than to maintain his own image. I doubt you have a scintilla of insight of the criteria used in academe to evaluate academics. Seems not to stop you from having the strongest of opinions of the subject. Larry P.S. BTW, our system of law rests of on concept that all brought before court have the right to counsel. While I have no particular love for the tobacco industry, an attorney is not responsible for the actions of his client. You sure manage to pack a lot of intellectual garbage into one short post.