SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: StockMan who wrote (64668)9/13/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
NOPE they will all continue laughing at the PRUDES of this world!!!

So far, Stockman, you've managed to insult anyone with:

1) Morals (even a hint)
2) Intelligence
3) A right-wing philosophy
4) Legitimate outrage towards Clinton's actions

You're certainly entitled to your own opinion, and you are certainly entitled to voice them as well. But just as surely as you're not taking our views seriously, we surely don't have to take yours seriously as well, OK?

Now let's just drop this subject, please. I'll still forgive Clinton whether he stays or not. That's the right thing to do for all Americans. But I sure won't forget. Even if Clinton stays, I'll honor him ONLY because he is president of our great nation, whether he deserves to or not. I don't have to like the guy to honor him. (I think this is the same attitude that most people in the military have towards Clinton, a well-known draft-dodger. They give up their lives for the American presidency, not for Clinton himself.)

Tenchusatsu



To: StockMan who wrote (64668)9/13/1998 11:28:00 PM
From: Dale J.  Respond to of 186894
 
Stockman,

You are in denial. Did you read the report other than the sex parts? It is about perjury. I can see why Star had to be so detailed as you and the Clintonites simply deny and make excuses.

If Clinton admits perjury, it's Game Over. He knows that. That is why he clings to that absurd argument. However, there are many who do not want him impeached. For that reason his absurd argument just might work.

Dale



To: StockMan who wrote (64668)9/14/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: ralph keating  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
I ask you a question did he break the LAW yes/no?<eom>