Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (5589)	9/13/1998 10:46:00 PM
From: cool	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Susan Webber Wright was wrong, she should have first determined if Paula Jones was sexually harassed--later determined no harassment occured--thrown out. Paula Jones never established that she suffered any damage at the workplace--that should have been proven first--- The right to Privacy should not be impringed upon just because an allegation was made, reasonable degree of harm must be first proven. The events occurred in reverse in the PJ case. Clinton's right to privacy was invaded by forcing him to testify about his affair, any decent judge would have first require Jones to prove harm. Did she lose her job, not receive promotion---