To: Tim Luke who wrote (1602 ) 9/14/1998 12:33:00 AM From: James F. Hopkins Respond to of 7247
Tim; Have you ever looked at the Nasdaq100 options ? I'm not recommending them as I myself have never looked at them to speak of. I have recently done a study of major indexes, ( but not the options ) The reason I think I want to investigate the NAZ100 , is it seems easier to predict and often has a better move percentage wise, than the others. I give that to the mo mo effect of the "index arbitrage" players of the S&P500, as the 4 top stocks in the NAZ100 are also high up on the hog in the S&P500. In short the S&P500 top 50 stocks has 50% of the cap, and get bought & sold more by index funds, as they track the index. So that's 10% of the stocks controlling 50% of the index. With the S&P100 I think it's 15% controlling 50% of the index, But With the NAZ100 it's 4% of the stocks controlling 50% of the index the top 4 in the NAZ100 make up over 50% of the cap. With only 4 stocks to check on , predicting that index is a cake walk. Not that I can do it all the time, but when I can't call it I can see that I can't, however when them four do give a signal it's a good one. ------------------ I suspect when the VIX is high as it has been lately that premiums on those options will also be high, and that may make trading them not very profitable. However I'm rolling around in my mind a program trading strategy that works them like the S&P arb players do with the spoos. Ie when are the 4 top stocks cheaper to own than the NAZ100 calls, or the calls cheaper to own than the stocks. The idea of only having to work 4 stocks appeals to me. MSFT , INTC , CSCO & DELL Make up 54.18% of the Nasdaq100 as of 8/28/98. There may be a way to form a plan around these 4 , were cathing a dip with an up signal one legs into the stocks "weighted" then works the index options aginst them depending on the premium. Jim