To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5271 ) 9/14/1998 12:04:00 AM From: bmart Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26163
Mr. Reece, In response; exchange2000.com from; ****** Talk : $5 and Under : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) | Disclaimer and Warning | Previous | Next | Respond | To: Ellen (51081 ) From: bmart Saturday, Aug 8 1998 3:29PM ET Reply # of 52251 Ms. Ellen, I very much appreciate that and will continue on with this, offered for your approval , of course. Good Day Ms. Ellen ---------------------------------------- To: Riley G (10804 ) From: mawork1 Sep 30 1997 4:26PM EST Reply #10905 of 10908 Attention Cartel Members! You are sheep being led to slaughter. Certain of your founders are in the employ of stock promoters. The "big short position" is a rouse. The stock promoters want you to pull your shares out of the market so they can dump theirs. So far, Mike Zapara has sold off 200,000 shares and put nearly $500,000 in his pocket at your expense. You can call him directly and confirm. Phone number is 760-773-9227." ----------------------------------------------- Recall that Dempsey Mork offered to settle his civil suit against RMIL for 200K shares, not the 100K shares he claims he is short RMIL on account of Mr. Zapara failing to deliver the shares. Also recall Mr. R. Baker informed us that he was shorting OVIS out of an account on behalf of Mr. Mork. ----------------------------- From: Riley G Monday, Oct 6 1997 2:41PM ET Reply # of 318 FWD Message: Subject: INTERSTING ITEM! Riley, Guess what? We heard some real interesting stories that has been happening in the TA office...... 1. Dempsey Mork is very well known in the old TA office. 2. Dempsey Mork has been seen in the old TA office on more than one occasion and he was seen leaving the office VERY UPSET! 3. Somebody in the TA office, a high ranking officer, is very upset with the whole situation about OVIS. The same person hates Gary Morgan very much. (Could it be that this person is short also? hmmmm!) This person is Dempsey Mork's friend. 4. Somebody was told to handtype the certificates instead of printing them. (VERY INTERESTING). No wonder it takes forever for the last certificate to be typed processed. I guess if an officer of the old TA office is short, then he/she would try to slow down the process also. 5. THE NEW TA, American Stock Transfer, IS A VERY PROMINENT TRANSFER AGENT. They are like the MSFT, INTEL, in their business. No one can slow down the process now for the new TA is not siding with anybody and will not put up with any BS from a Market Maker. They are a well known and very prominent TRANSFER AGENT. Almost all the brokers I have asked knows the company in comparison to the old TA, where not everybody knows them or even heard their name."----- --------------------------------------- GIFS & OVIS used the same TA; The SEC attorney handling the OVIS investigation also handled the GIFS investigation; exchange2000.com To: Harvey Kirby (7344 ) From: Ken Todd Thursday, Mar 5 1998 12:45PM ET Reply # of 7749 Please fax this to the SEC (Attention: Paige Harper) at (305) 982-6391 or simply drop a copy in the mail to: Paige Harper United States Securities and Exchange Commission Southeast Regional Office Suite 200 1401 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 And, thanks Ken --------------------------------------------------------- Recall the poster'Micky', a past contributor to the RMIL board, posted that shorts win "bigtime" if the stock is halted; exchange2000.com ....." they will win, some bigtime if a company is halted, so they don't have to cover. It's just business, same as trading, etc."...... ------------------------------------- The question that begs to be answered is, are the individuals bashing RMIL short RMIL? Were they short GIFS ? It is illegal for "individuals" to short BB stocks , if they are/were not short RMIL or GIFS, who was/is? exchange2000.com "....And how would you be able to break every one of us? Even more curious...." -------------------------- And one can see the kind of reaction inquiries into the 144's were yeilding from faces familiar on the RMIL thread; exchange2000.com -----"And I have NO compassion for *whiners* who expect sympathy from me merely because they made a "shady" business transaction and are afraid to pursue their claims, if legitimate, through the legal process."--- ------------------------------------------- Of relevance to RMIL shareholders are if any of the suspicious ongoings at that particular TA is relevant to a long position in RMIL, and the seemingly endless bashing of RMIL by individuals who were active in the GIFS fiasco. Is there a legitimate reason, outside of a short position to protect, that warrants the time and energy devoted to RMIL? RB ****************** ***** exchange2000.com Good Evening RB