SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ciena (CIEN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: George Bielski who wrote (3009)9/14/1998 1:47:00 AM
From: Chris Helton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
 
this PR report you printed re Pirelli and Ascend could easily be compared to the Cisco/Ciena PR re IP Routers connecting to DWDM. Ciena doesn't care whether the port is ATM or IP, they have set their equipment to accept OC-48 (i.e. 2.5 GB) data streams.
Ciena is working with Cisco, Pirelli is working with Ascend. which one would you bet on? I would take Cisco anyday. It is not a matter of which technology is better. Both will work and carriers will use both. It will come down to marketing muscle. Cisco. Cisco. Cisco.



To: George Bielski who wrote (3009)9/14/1998 2:06:00 AM
From: jach  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
 
CIEN revenue based calculation yields 36$ to 60$ range

CIEN with revenue of about 600M can be easily calculated based on average historical networking companies acquisition range of 6 to 10 times revenue; that will be between 36$ to 60$ range.
CIEN at this 16$ is a big bargain considering the installed base, technology and the large well-known customer base such as SPRINT, Bell Atlantic, Cabe and Wireless and with Cisco. Pirelli and Teleport, never ever heard about them up till now; may be for tires and car ports