Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (786)	9/14/1998 6:45:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 1533

>>making that behavior such an issue as to create illegality where none would have existed without the prosecutor's zeal.<< excuse me, mr revisionist. mr starr didn't make bill clinton testify and perjure himself in the paula jones trial. what are you smoking? psssst, can i have some ;-)

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (786)	9/14/1998 8:25:00 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1533

So you beleive then that when a Court orders you to do something you beleive is private, you can ignore it? If Clinton did not want to answer the question truthfully, he could have objected, appealed, etc. Instead he chose to LIE UNDER OATH. JLA

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (786)	9/14/1998 10:19:00 AM
From: mrknowitall	Respond to of 1533

J Doe: I know it was early in the morning when you posted this, but: " . . . entrapping of someone that was not doing anything illegal and making that behavior such an issue as to create illegality where none would have existed* without the prosecutor's zeal.* Illegality is not "creatable." It either is, or it isn't illegal. Starr did not "create" the Paula Jones case in which Clinton began his web of lies. He was made aware of it and took the evidence to a three-judge panel who AGREED that there was sufficient cause to investigate further. I gather that you have rationalized your President's behavior to the degree that lying under oath about material facts in a civil case, and then lying under oath before a grand jury is OK, as long as the subject matter is deemed by the accused to be private. How convenient. Fortunately, the courts have never agreed with you. Mr. K.