Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bullmarket who wrote (25782)	9/14/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: ayahuasca	Respond to of 50264

still no volume. The only time we have seen volume over 200,000 shares recently is on days of downward price moves. Today a whopping 2700 shares traded so far. Another up day for the market and so far nada from our little BB stock. We'll see what happens when the SB-10 is released. As R1 said I am not going to get my hopes up too much for that and that alone to be the catalyst. Frankly, I dont know what it will take but it seems clear that there are very few people aware/interested in DGIV. Sometimes good companies are just ignored by the market. I hope that dgivinvestor's comments about a marketing campaign are accurate. If not, it could be a long time before DGIV's stock rises to match the company's merits. The volume tells all. (BTW, Elane this is the basis from which I made the comment that you refuted about nobody being interested in DGIV- I dont think I need inside information to be able to tell that nobody is buying this stock at the moment). Like everyone else, I hope that changes soon. I wonder about a more extensive relationship with NMSS. I wonder if DGIV is in a position to buy a company such as this. Of course that would be the quickest route to NAS which I think is the necessary step to new highs for DGIV's stock. Could we be in a position to take over such a company. I dont know if it is possible at this stage and I think the SB-10 might allow us to see if we have the resources to complete such an aquisition. I know this has been discussed before, just throwing it out again for more discussion.

To: bullmarket who wrote (25782)	9/14/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: HG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

IP Compatibility with Lucent, Vocaltec Did anyone happen to see today's joint release from Lucent and Vocaltec? The emphasis is on intercompatibility: biz.yahoo.com Much is made of the H. 323 protocol, and its robust compatibility. Now, DGIV, in its Natural Microsystems release, describes itself as H. 323 compatible as well, which bodes well. I do have one question, for a techie in the know: Lucent's release states "version 2"... Is that something new, or just a more specific designation of what everyone means when they say H.323? Howard Gordon