Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mp who wrote (64714)	9/14/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

mp,>>>And stop subtly bringing politics into this thread <<< I agree and will try to comply. But, just FYI, I do not care for Newt Gingrinch any more than I care for Bill Clinton. I am an equal opportunity political basher. Mary

To: mp who wrote (64714)	9/14/1998 11:36:00 AM
From: Diamond Jim	Respond to of 186894

MP, This is a thread and country of free speech, Mary continue on, jim

To: mp who wrote (64714)	9/14/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

And stop subtly bringing politics into this thread. I'm sorry, but your statement is way out of line. Mary has the decency to come back to the subject of Intel from the big off-topic debate over Clinton and Starr, and you chide her for mentioning "politics"? Let's face it, even Intel isn't immune from the "wag the dog" politics of Tom Kurlak. It's unfortunate, but it's very relevant to us as Intel investors. Besides, Kurlak is a better comparison to Starr than Carville any day, anyway. Last time I checked, Kurlak isn't investigating whether CEO Craig Barrett had an "improper relationship" with that female intern in the Merced group. Tenchusatsu