Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5334)	9/14/1998 11:36:00 AM
From: Hogger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Could you please expound on this statement ... <<<You won the arbitration matter, now step up to the plate and answer this question and only this question.>>> Who won what arbitration statement? Are you saying that everyone who claimed such an arbitration 'hearing' was indeed lying? Was there such a hearing ... a legitimate hearing with both parties participating and bound by the outcome, or was it all a fabrication? If the latter, why was the effort expended to make it appear that there was a hearing with results that were negative insofar as AZNT was concerned> Hogger

To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5334)	9/14/1998 11:37:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Actually I think posting the cancelled check and any other documents you may consider relevant would be a good idea. You won't, of course, persuade bmart to change his mind, but others, more intelligent, may be convinced.

To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5334)	9/14/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: bmart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Mr. Jahid, Lets make the Wellrich story very clear, first off, What is your current relationship with Mr. Shurr? Was Mr. Shurr an employee of Wellrich from 2/97 to 5/97? Was Mr. Shurr dealing securities for Wellrich? After Mr. Shurr left Wellrich, was Wellrich able to legally act as a brokerage? Who provided Wellrich their lead lists? Where is the Sept. 10th judgement that Ms. Shell & Mr. Mitchell suggests, on your behalf it appears, exists? Was their a binding contract with AZNT after 5/97? Answer these questions and we can move on to discovering the truth between Wellrich ans AZNT. BTW, you don't seem to be concerned about the hype and speculation that Mr. Mitchell and Ms. Shell have spread about AZNT on your behalf? Why doesn't that concern you? Why have you chosen SI as a forum for "litigating" this as opposed to a court of law? RB

To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5334)	9/14/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 26163

Sarab, just think of bmart as comic relief. Of course if he libeled me, perhaps I wouldn't be laughing as much as I am. Good luck getting him to answer your questions. You'd have better luck drawing blood from a stone. - Jeff

To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5334)	9/14/1998 1:09:00 PM
From: bmart	Respond to of 26163

"....Ok, Mr. Bmart for the sake of embarrassment let's just say there was not arbitration. We are the liars and you are the defender of truth. Since you are the defender of truth, explain this. In a previous post you said that WellRich pocketed monies and shares. WellRich does not own any shares of AZNT and that can be confirmed by the transfer agent. Also, how could WellRich have pocketed monies when all monies were sent to AZNT? As the defender of truth I ask that you answer these questions please. You won the arbitration matter, now step up to the plate and answer this question and only this question....." Mr. Jihad, Thank you for informing us that the "arbitration" & "judgement" contentions were , indeed, fabricated. Now, to address your questions, with the hope you will finally respond to mine; Wellrich called potenial investors from a lead list supplied by AZNT. Mr. Shurr left Wellrich 5/97. After that date there was no one at Wellrich that could deal securities. From the lead list Wellrich procured an investor for stock. Wellrich expected a commission fee (that is why they are buisness, is it not? ), Since Mr. Shurr had left Wellrich, they were not legally licensed to deal securities, hence no contract, hence, no arbitration, hence no commissions. No contracts, no contracts to break. I hope you will respond to my questions now. RB