SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gbh who wrote (54160)9/14/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: KM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
Not to mention those bank mergers - CCI/TRV, NB/BOA.



To: gbh who wrote (54160)9/14/1998 5:33:00 PM
From: gbh  Respond to of 61433
 
New competitor for ASND and CSCO on ATM front????

Top Stories: *Update* Tellabs
Isn't Looking to Be Acquired

By Kevin Petrie
Staff Reporter
9/14/98 5:03 PM ET

After TSC posted a story on his company's
prospects, Tellabs (TLAB:Nasdaq) CEO Michael Birck
returned a call and said Tellabs is not looking to
be acquired.

"I don't think that's very likely," Birck says.
While heft is important among telecom suppliers,
he doesn't think folding into a larger concern is
necessary to survive. On the other hand, Birck
will consider acquiring other companies, although
no deals are on the table.

In the meantime Tellabs has other priorities. One
is to speed internal development of asynchronous
transfer mode switches that would compete with
products made by industry leader Cisco
(CSCO:Nasdaq) and highflier Ascend (ASND:Nasdaq),
Birck says.


And he disagrees with investors who worry about
the threat of optical technology. Tellabs' core
products, he says, can augment optical systems,
not just be supplanted by them.

The following story was posted at 4:08 p.m. EDT.

Back to the Drawing Board at Tellabs

Desperately seeking a partner. That's Tellabs
(TLAB:Nasdaq), which thought this summer it had
found one but whose headaches in this deal-crazed
sector may have just begun.

Today the telecommunication-equipment supplier
called off its merger with troubled Ciena
(CIEN:Nasdaq), a builder of bandwidth-boosting
products for optical fiber networks. The merger
began unraveling after onetime highflier Ciena
lost out on two contracts and made gloomy
forecasts about earnings growth.

This morning, Tellabs executives warned in a
conference call that sales fell a bit short in the
current quarter. Tellabs said slow bookings in
August will keep third-quarter profits from
exceeding second-quarter levels. However, the
executives assured analysts that they were
comfortable Tellabs could earn $2.35 per share in
1999, according to one money manager listening to
the call.

The Ciena merger would have allowed Lisle,
Ill.-based Tellabs to broaden its product line in
order to stake a position as the telecom industry
moves from electronic phone networks to more
advanced optical networks that carry lots of data.

Now Tellabs faces difficult choices.

"This isn't great news for Tellabs," says vice
president Phillip Coburn with Lynch & Mayer, an
institutional money manager. "The indications for
the last two years is that that they needed to
cross the chasm" and delve into new technologies,
Coburn said.

Now, Tellabs could either acquire a networker that
provides remote access or asynchronous transfer
mode network products, or it could be acquired by
a bigger player.

But "either of those strategies is not the one
that Tellabs wanted to pursue," Coburn says. He
declined to state his firm's position or history
with the two stocks, but said he concluded this
summer that it would be difficult for the merger
to add to Tellabs' earnings next year.

Another money manager said he sold Tellabs even as
it was renegotiating the Ciena merger. At first
the stock swap was valued at $7 billion, but after
Ciena lost a possible AT&T (T:NYSE) contract,
Tellabs and Ciena shares retreated and the firms
renegotiated, cutting the deal's value to $4.9
billion.

"As much as I like Tellabs and respect them, they
just seemed too hungry to do the deal," says Craig
Ellis, manager of Orbitex Info-Tech Fund.
Tellabs' eagerness showed possible signs of
weakness, Ellis mused.

The paramount question: When will "digital
cross-connects," Tellabs' core products, be
supplanted by new generations of network products
that carry signals in light rather than electronic
digits? Tellabs' problems this quarter indicate
the answer might be sooner rather than later. It
might be easier to determine in the fourth
quarter, which is often stronger that the third.

"I'm going to be hesitant to go back into Tellabs
at this point," says Ellis. One reason is that
Tellabs might find it hard to find the right
partner.

Possible targets include Advanced Fibre
Communications (AFCI:Nasdaq) which also sells to
Baby Bells, but Ellis says its electronic-based
products would do little to complement Tellabs'
offerings. An Advanced Fibre spokeswoman could not
be reached for comment.

On the other hand, Tellabs could be acquired by
Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq) or Ascend (ASND:Nasdaq),
which are major players. However, Ellis says these
companies would benefit little from purchasing
Tellabs' older telephone-based technology. Cisco
declined to comment, and Ascend officials could
not be reached to comment.

A slightly more plausible scenario is Tellabs
snapping up Fore Systems (FORE:Nasdaq), a builder
of strong ATM boxes that could benefit from
Tellabs' enviable client list of Baby Bells. For
its part, Tellabs would get Internet-based
architecture. Ellis says Fore is a digestible
candidate, but he still finds a deal highly
speculative. A Fore spokesman declined to comment.

Ellis says Lucent (LU:NYSE), Northern Telecom
(NT:NYSE) or Alcatel (ALA:NYSE ADR) are unlikely
to purchase Tellabs in the near term. Those
companies compete with Tellabs, so there is
product overlap. Nortel declined to comment;
Lucent and Alcatel could not be reached to
comment.

And for Tellabs the mating dance begins all over
again.