Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (5724)	9/14/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: DMaA	Respond to of 13994

In fact, Starr asks congress NOT to release all the lurid details.

To: mrknowitall who wrote (5724)	9/14/1998 4:27:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer	Respond to of 13994

Rick - you're confused - Starr didn't release the report. The House voted to do so. You're right; I stand corrected. My intent was to refer to the inclusion of the details in his report. That's what I get for watching a Level II screen while posting on SI. I suppose the only real alternative Starr had would be to submit a bare-bones (i.e., G-rated) report, wait for the outcry that "there are no details!", then submit the full report. But it's not like we haven't been warned about what might have been in there. We had lawyers and Clinton trying to define "sexual relations," we had stains on a dress, we had Monica's 37 visits to the White House... it didn't take too many brains to see where it was all going. Anyone seen a Clinton air-conditioner yet? RS