Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Travis who wrote (17961)	9/14/1998 7:19:00 PM
From: Alomex	Respond to of 213182

Don't be ka ka. I try no to, Travis, but you are speaking to the wrong person. The facts are there. You can go and find the postings where Eric accused me of making up the trades, the posting where he claims I'm always wrong, and you can compare the "quote" with the actual posting. Here's more context from the same week: I think the iMac will allows us to forecast the shape of things to come. If it does sell as well as production implies, Apple would at long last post growing revenues. (http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-5165384) So, my points were: (a) Apple's revenue growth was dependant on how the iMac did. (b) Not enough iMacs would be sold to post growing revenues. Now before you bulls get full of yourselves :-) let me remind you with regards to point (b) that almost all here would have been happy with 200 thousand iMacs sold in Q3. This would have resulted in flat revenues for Q3. About point (a) I'd say there is little argument about that, even in hindsight. That is solid, plausible, rational analysis, even if turns out to be wrong. Ka ka is posting misleading quotes and false accusations of made up trades.