Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Redman who wrote (330)	9/14/1998 7:04:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 567

I am not kidding you. The court's ruled the privileges did not apply. They certainly did not rule that he did not have the right to ask the courts to determine whether they did. So you're saying anytime somebody looses when asserting a privilege for the court to consider, and then complies fully with the court's decision, that that person has committed a crime? Or abused his office or other position? That is absurd. It will go nowhere. The argument is a good illustration of Starr's blinded and unbalanced zealousness. Though I haven't liked Starr much for some time, it very much surprised me that the made the argument. Doug