Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (37031)	9/14/1998 8:24:00 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570477

Kash, I think he had a target of $80 when the price was $40. Pravin.

To: kash johal who wrote (37031)	9/14/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570477

Kash - Re: " If they can ship sharptooth early Q1 at 400Mhz speeds this will really hurt Intel." Get serious ! Sharptooth was supposed to be shipped in late Q398 or Q498, so AMD is at least a full quarter behind schedule. Especially since Sanders said at the Conference Call in July that Sharptooth was "running in the lab". I guess he meant it was "running into testing problems " ! Intel has been shipping Mendocino for almost two months (with the formal launch on August 24) and Intel's Dixon, the "equivalent" to Sharptooth with 356K L2 cache on the CPU silicon, has been functional for over two months and is already in pre-production. Paul