SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5429)9/14/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: bmart  Respond to of 26163
 
Mr. Jihad,
Can you fax me the "judgement" from the Sept. 10th "arbitration hearing Ms. Shell and Mr.Mitchell claim. Can you verify that claim? Do you endorse that claim? Was it you who fed them the information they are posting on S.I.? Why did you choose to 'litigate' this on SI as opposed to in a court of law?

RB



To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5429)9/14/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: bmart  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
Mr.Jihad,
What is your current relationship with Mr. Shur? After Mr. Shur left Wellrich 5/97 , wellrich could not deal securities, so your contract with AZNT was null & void. No contract, no contract to break, no arbitration. How many shares did Mr. Shurr short AZNT? Who rec'd commissions from sales of stock after Mr. Shur left Wellrich?

RB



To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5429)9/14/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: Rich_1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
Jihad, yep. No fool would spend all their time constantly looking for dirt to exploit (ie. never saying anything positive and the shareholder is always wrong) if they had no (short) interest at stake. Nobody's that stupid.
Can the truth ever be positive for the shareholder? Is their illegal shorting which occurs on the BB including AZNT which hurts long investors all the time? Only if I had a significant short position would I bother behaving they way they have all day, all night, and all weekend long for months. BTW, why is it that, as you claim which I believe is BS, that they work the thread bashing, picking fights with shareholders, and looking for negatives to post on all because they want the truth. IMO, the truth hurts you and them; and that is why you all must behave this way 24 hours a day.

Rich_1



To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5429)9/14/1998 9:27:00 PM
From: Hogger  Respond to of 26163
 
I can't speak for anyone else, but I would actually be shocked to hear the truth ... unless you are going to next state for the record that there was indeed a judgement issued in your favor and that you fully support the contentions put forth by Mitchell, Shell and others ... and BTW, if these folks are not paid bashers, which ones are? An inquiring public wants to know. We are not asking what AZNT knows, we want you to confirm or deny, specifically, "Who is paid?" and where is the judgement?

You Sir, are doing an excellent job of hanging your friends, (associates, or co-horts, or whatever) out to dry.

Should we consider your silence on this matter as an admission or having engineered the fabrication of a very poor legend?

Hogger



To: Sarab J. Jihad who wrote (5429)9/14/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: Hogger  Respond to of 26163
 
Oh JJ (Pardon the familiarity, but .... you know),

When you address the issue of bogus FBN's (The Fecal Bovine Nodules) surrounding the great arbitration hearing, could you also address the issue of dealing stocks without a licensed party on staff under whose auspices you appear to have no longer been under.

Now, did you, or did you not engage in an illegal activity in soliciting for the sale of AZNT stock?

Not implying ... just seeking the truth, I remain, the

Hogger