Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (5788)	9/14/1998 10:37:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

The noose is closing. JLA

To: Scrapps who wrote (5788)	9/14/1998 10:57:00 PM
From: Doughboy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

There are two things to conclude about Whitewater. 1. Starr has nothing substantial and credible to report to Congress on Clinton. Therefore, this is a waste of a report. 2. He is not going to indict anyone else on Whitewater. The only other possible person to indict is Hillary, and he would be crazy to do that. Hillary is the cuckolded wife. Starr will have to treat her with kid gloves if he is going to have any hope of getting Clinton. FOBs right now are in pretty good shape. As long as Bill has impeachment charges hanging over him, Starr is going to have to back off. If it appears that he is indicting friends in order to strongarm them to turn on Bill, he will look spiteful (see his experience with Susan McDougal). In the classic food chain prosecution you start with the little fish and end up with the big one. You never go after the little fish AFTER the big fish. Doughboy.