SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hogger who wrote (5455)9/15/1998 12:33:00 AM
From: s martin  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 26163
 
>>Oh yes, here we go again ... the bashers stay around long after the squeeze or short sell or whatever ..<<

long after what squeeze, I haven't seen the squeeze have you? Rich was referring to RMIL's "squeeze" which has yet to materialize. It seems that before that can happen the RMILians are all being asked to throw some more money to the wolves....and having learned nada, they seem intent on doing so.

>>nor will they be open with documenting their wobbly stances.<<

Since you mention being open about documenting wobbly stances... why is it you have refused to "document" that any exclusive agreement to export exists. I think we just may have a lurker who can translate Portugese if you would be so kind as to provide the agreement.

>>BTW, has JJ given you the script for your rebuttals to the charges levied today or are you going to attempt to twist and spin on your own? How are you going to address the matter of his implying that the arbitration and judgement allegations are more FBN's from the BSB.<<

I haven't conferred with JJ but there doesn't seem to be much doubt that Sylver has reneged on a debt... we know from his history that this is a pattern with him.

As many alarm bells as there seem to be with AZNT, it seems that those who continue to staunchly defend their investment here are wearing the same blinders and earplugs as the RMILians. I would not be surprised to see the same outcome.



To: Hogger who wrote (5455)9/15/1998 1:14:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
why just look how CYGS has kept the same number of basher posts as it had when they were robbing money from those who invested in it.

Oh come off it. Cheap shot. You want someone to blame, I suggest you take a good hard look at management, as we did. Investing in a company run by people with a track record like theirs is an extremely poor idea.

And I suppose you feel no resentment toward Big Dog and the other pump & dumpers who tried to run the thing to five bucks? Remember how Clinton was gonna hold a press conference to discuss the "medical breakthrough of the century"?

So much easier to be childish, isn't it? You didn't get rich quick, it's our fault. Never mind the people who might be scammed by false claims of a cure for cancer; what do they matter?