To: d:oug who wrote (34208 ) 9/15/1998 3:40:00 AM From: d:oug Respond to of 35569
Chuck, that e-mail you received about pledging shares, hopefully it was legit, and the following: <<< They mentioned just reading the Jay Taylor E-mail report. >>> is true and my deduction being that Jay must have said something positive about IPM. With J Taylor being burned by his past recommendations on desert dirts, I would expect J Taylor to be extemely careful and certain of the facts he bases his opinion on. I have noticed that Bill Jackson has posted a lot of dribble on this thread monday. Bill is acting like that little boy no one except the rejects will play with, so he hangs around us normal folks and acts as if he belongs here. Some of us are polite to him out of pity, and some of us try and see the good in all people and give Bill the chance to shed his Jackass image, but Bill is a jackass in sheeps clothing. The dictionary gives jackass as A foolish or stupid person. I'am not sure, but was it Chatters that got suspended for 2 weeks. If so, great, but I would have perfered it being Bill Jackson. At least Chatters posted with a degree of dignity and self awareness, eventho he was flawed in the awareness of others catagory. Reading Chatters posts did not contribute to well being, but was most of the time interesting to read. Chatters posts are like junk food, lots of calories and flavor, but not the stuff needed to enrich oneself. Bill Jackson's post are also like junk food, but those made with that fat substitute Olean in those WOW potato chips, you know, that fat like stuff that is not absorbed, but flows thru the tube until it reaches the exit and slips out like mineral oil. With Chatters posts, you get the impact upfront and then its a bad memory. But with Bill jackson's post, its the same junk upfront, but you know later on, like a stink that won't go away, it will reappear in a slimely untimely way. Remember when I said that I was wrong in thinking Bill Jackson was not a sicko, well two wrongs don't make a right, as in I was wrong about being wrong, but Bill Jackson may not be a sicko, but he ain't right. To qualify as a sicko, you have to have a degree of control over your actions that can only be described as very strong. Howelse can a person continually degrade onself in front of others and not let the correct part of reality repell oneself from this incorrectness unless one has a very strong command over ones sence of right and wrong. Now Bill Jackson, it is now clear to me kind of floats to this thread and is shaped and molded by what others say, and then Bill Jackson will come back with a reply, even when he has nothing to say or add. Just so Bill Jackson can type in letters onto the keyboard and be noticed by the normal folks, then he feels that he is part of the group. Doug