Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John C James who wrote (348)	9/15/1998 9:13:00 AM
From: HRAKA	Respond to of 567

Mr. James, <Mr. Clinton has shown repeatedly that he puts his self-interest above the interest of the nation> - This has EVERYTHING to do with performance. Sincerely, Hraka

To: John C James who wrote (348)	9/15/1998 9:14:00 AM
From: Mike Milde	Respond to of 567

Clinton has gone to great lengths to hide this. What do you think would happen if Iraq had all the evidence before Ken Starr got it? You don't give as much power as the president has to someone that foolishly sets himself up with dirty little secrets. The military has never allowed people with "dirty little secrets" to have power, for exactly that reason. Mike

To: John C James who wrote (348)	9/15/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: capitalistbeatnik	Respond to of 567

THIS DOES NOT NEGATE THE ELECTION. Gore will be President, not Dole. If I were an ethical leftist, I would call for Clinton to go. In addition to being the right thing to do and leaving the left morally consistent on women's issues, it puts the most liberal President in control of a booming economy so he can run as an incumbent in two years. Not a bad situation. Much better than having a nonincumbent VP run against a GOP candidate like George Bush or Steve Forbes who promise to clean house.