Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Id who wrote (17040)	9/15/1998 4:07:00 AM
From: Gerald Walls	Respond to of 77397

Actually, I could care less if a guy lies about an affair. Me too, unless it's under oath. He didn't just lie about an affair. He lied about it under oath as a defendant in a law suit where the judge had ruled that he had to give the testimony (although having to provide testimony does not mean that it has to later be allowed to be presented). That makes it a felony. I think it's much more "impeachable" to lie about illegal arms deals. All of those calling for Clinton's head will defend Reagan's lying and throw in b.s. about his "ending the cold war". What simplistic thinking, and what hypocricy. If anyone, Clinton, Reagan, Bush, etc., can be proven to having committed a crime in office they should be removed. We have more corrupt politicians than the Roman Senate. Just because most are corrupt doesn't mean that even one should be let off. Fry them all.