SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BRONCO BILLY who wrote (6024)9/15/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: trenzich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6735
 
It is not really rocket science to post, is it?
so i sayeth Gary

......trenzich

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- Solv-Ex Corp. denied any allegation of wrongdoing
in response to a Securties and Exchange Commission complaint alleging
Solv-Ex and two of its officers violated securties laws.

As reported July 20, the SEC compliant filed in the New Mexico District
Court alleges the company, Chairman and Chief Executive John S. Rendall
and Senior Vice President Herbert M.Campbell issued false, misleading or
deficient public statements and filings regarding the company's process
developed to extract oil and industrial minerals from oil sands as well
as its technology to produce metallic aluminum.

Solv-Ex said the complaint also alleges it understated its outstanding
common stock by 3 million shares for the period ending March 31, 1996.
That allegation relates to a 3-million-share certificate issue in the
name of Rendall in connection with a proposed funding arragement that
was never completed.

In a press release Friday, Solv-Ex said it believes the SEC's
allegations are without merit.

The company's answer filed with the court also asserts that the public
statements were not the primary cause of price movement in Solv-Ex stock
between January 1995 and April 1997.

Solv-Ex attributed the price movement to short-sellers and false and
misleading statements disseminated by others.

Solv-Ex also filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the complaint
with respect to the allegations involving the issuance of the 3 million
shares and requested it be awarded its fees and other expenses in the
matter.