Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (2856)	9/15/1998 2:25:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Mr Know it all, No you are confused. You know why? Because you dont seem to understand the playing field. The key here is public perception. And we all know the public eats up tabloid journalism. So, regardless of the legality, the document that you put forth to the public has to immediately appear to drive home the objective. Which, as I understood it, was perjury, etc - NOT SEX (well thats what everyone here kept telling me). If you absolutely have to obtain the lurid details of each encounter in order to prove perjery (which I still dont think was necessary AT ALL but since I dont have a legal background Ill give it to you) then you put those titillating details in a separate document and for gods sake dont publish them on the internet! Because you know what the public is going to do when they see this explicit stuff! They are going to think it was about sex arent they! DOH!