Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2862)	9/15/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 67261

Good grief woman, not only was the "report" released to the judiciary committee in it's entirety, so was all of the supporting documentation. All 2000+ pages, plus audio and video taped testimony. Once the report was given to the appropriate congressional committee, they elected to release the entire report on the internet. They held public meetings hammering out the details on how the information contained was to be disseminated.....The methodology was determined on a bi-partisan basis. bp

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2862)	9/15/1998 3:30:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, Starr's actions with regard to the information are dictated by the IC Statute. His charter is to provide information to the Congress of potential impeachable offenses. That's what he did. As bp stated, Congress put the book on the internet. My problem with what Starr did focuses on the construction of his report. He devoted more time to the sex than he did to the crimes this corrupt president committed. That fed Starr's detractors. I am very disappointed in him.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2862)	9/15/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

Starr in fact did recommend that Congress limit access to the report. He was ignored because the leadership knows there is no way to keep it under wraps. JLA