Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2864)	9/15/1998 3:08:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>And you guys dont get it. The argument I am making is not a legal one - its a public perception argument. I dont need context to make a public perception argument. You put one paragraph about kinky sex in a document otherwise full of legalities and you know what? The public is going to think its about sex! < As well it should, madam! The President yet claims he has legally HAD no sex. Therefore, Starr is forced to show the world that the President is lying through his crooked teeth.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2864)	9/15/1998 3:09:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

"Like many others, when I read the Starr report I could not believe the endless, repetitious, salacious detail was necessary to disprove the president's denial of sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. But after watching David Kendall, Clinton's attorney, on ABC's "This Week" Sunday morning, smugly and condescendingly twisting words and denying reality, I can understand what drove Starr to dump every bit of trash he had collected onto the president's head." -David S. Broder You see, madam? Here is one of your own, for once in his life, speaking reasonably.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2864)	9/15/1998 3:15:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

"Like many others, when I read the Starr report I could not believe the endless, repetitious, salacious detail was necessary to disprove the president's denial of sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. But after watching David Kendall, Clinton's attorney, on ABC's "This Week" Sunday morning, >>SMUGLY<< and >>>CONDESCENDINGLY TWISTING WORDS<<< and >>>>DENYING REALITY<<<<, I can understand what drove Starr to dump every bit of trash he had collected onto the president's head." -David S. Broder Madam. Here is the thing with my emphasis so that you might feel the point in your bones. Henceforth, back off of Starr. He did the only reasonable thing.