To: Sam who wrote (6436 ) 9/16/1998 11:43:00 AM From: Robert Douglas Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9980
Sorry there is no URL unless you are a subscriber to "The Economist", something I would consider as valuable as a subscription to the Wall Street Journal and membership in Silicon Investor. <g> You ask what is good about this article? Well, for starters, as Stitch said earlier, it reads like something out of Readers Digest. I have found that most good ideas are easy to explain and don't need to contain letters from the Greek alphabet or results of multi-regression analyses. Now don't get me wrong, I don't agree with all that was said in the article and really the excerpts were meant as teasers and not a synopsis. I do agree with Sachs in several key areas, primarily that "developing countries should impose their own supervisory controls on short-term international borrowing by domestic financial institutions". This was not as you suggested a call for an "international body" to control this, but rather wise council that the most desirable capital for banks to use would be domestic and long term in nature. Perhaps the most appealing thing to me about the article was that it didn't waste time regurgitating a litany of woes and mistakes that have been made. I have lived long enough and read enough history to know that problems become magnified during a crisis and the path through them looks precarious if possible to see at all. In most cases this just isn't so. When I talk with my father, a man in his 80s, he reminds me to look at the 20th century as a whole and marvel at the progress that has been made. He was born in a year that 30 million people died of the flu, raised in the great depression, fought in WWII, watched as Communism was touted as the "future" and then suddenly disappeared, watched American capitalism go through crises in the 1930s and 1970s, lived through a number of banking crises, recessions and inflation. Each of these, he reports, seemed hopeless at its worst. Is he worried about Asia? Not in the least, in fact he just bought some "Asia" mutual funds. For long-term investments! I prefer his perspective to the 25 year olds that Sachs takes to task. -Robert