SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (3005)9/15/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Yes, very interesting indeed! Wanna take a little wager that partisan bickering between Dems and Reps leaves it in place, with the Dems arguing for, and the Reps arguing against keeping it ?



To: j g cordes who wrote (3005)9/15/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: j_b  Respond to of 67261
 
<<tell me where in the constitution this is proper>>

Are you actually suggesting that Starr did not have the legal right to ask for the documentation and take the evidence? The Constitution gives the power to investigate the President to Congress, and Congress delegated it to Starr. It's all perfectly legal.

Before you completely condemn the process, remember that this is exactly what the common criminal goes through when they deal with the police and the D.A.'s office.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News