Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (3021)	9/16/1998 1:52:00 AM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Z,I believe that Monica testified their were two other occasions that he accomplished the same objective with his hand.That should do the job .But of course it wasn't as embarrassing to BC. I assume you are right about the three instances that accomplish the same objective. (did all three include using an object to stimulate? as I am guessing that was what he was trying to demonstrate. Wasn't one of the items in the definition using an object to stimulate? Will the next argument be that a cigar is not an object?) I also agree that should do the job! Is your argument if Starr gave us one example then Clinton is guilty of perjury in the Jones case but since we have three examples and you find one of them embarrassing he is not guilty of perjury? Are you basing your judgement of Clinton on the way Starr presents the evidence? The problem is Bill still claims he did not have sexual relations with Monika as defined in the Paula Jones case. He knows that if he admits to this that he would be admitting perjury. He knows this is a serious crime. That is why he is so steadfast in his denial. _____________________________________________________________________ BTW, I am not right wing. I choose to focus on Clinton's situation as he is the President. All other players are small fry and not worthy of all of this name calling nonsense. Taking positions on Clinton's guilt or innocence based on personal reactions to right wing and left wing stances is absurd IMO. Zeuspaul anyone have a link where I can download the entire report with one click?