To: Hawkmoon who wrote (9865 ) 9/15/1998 11:20:00 PM From: Riley G Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13091
How wrong you are about your disclosure comments. I suggest that you actually read the section that you post about so often. You appear to be in direct violation of the article as you have already admitted in this forum and others that GRNO paid for your plane trip(s)(and was that also expenses?), along with discounted shares in what appears to be a limited partnership, and what else was that. Oh yes, the computer equipment that GRNO gave you to help publish your newsletter. It is evident that a consideration was received or to be received, directly or indirectly by you from GRNO, and that you failed to disclose this fact to all the GRNO shareholders and others that received your newsletter. Where as, I am just a shareholder that did not receive a consideration nor a promise of a consideration, directly or indirectly from any other security that I have ever owned or will own in the future. Something that you can not claim, and failed to do so in the GRNO incident. That's what you are being sued for by the SEC and maybe other shareholders! IMHO....law.uc.edu b. It shall be unlawful for any person, by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, to publish, give publicity to, or circulate any notice, circular, advertisement, newspaper, article, letter, investment service, or communication which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof. ______________________________________________________________________To: BuzzVA (9864 ) From: Ron Reece Tuesday, Sep 15 1998 11:07PM ET Reply # of 9866 Hey Buzz... Ain't this guy just "Mother Beautiful"?? Did he tell you he was also subpoenaed by the SEC for his activities related to TVSI??Just figured I would expose him to the same "disclosure" that he has subjected me to. <vbg> Regards, Ron