SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert K. who wrote (7248)9/16/1998 8:42:00 PM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
Xoma site now links to abstracts of the 5 / ICAAC presentations, not just description of topic.

Sample below:

Open Label, Pilot Phase II Trial of Three Dose Levels of
Recombinant Bactericidal/ Permeability- Increasing Protein
(rBPI-21) Administered by Continuous Intravenous Infusion to
Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

P.N.R. Heseltine (1), T.V. Berne (1), A. Luterman (2), M.R. Carlson (3), S.S. Kim (3), and M.L.
White (3). (1) LAC-University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, (2)
University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, and (3) XOMA Corporation, Berkeley, CA.

Rationale/Design: Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI), a 55 kDa protein found in the azurophilic
granules of neutrophils, has anti-infective properties that contribute to host defense against bacteria. Recombinant 21-kDa
BPI (rBPI-21) has been shown to have anti-bacterial and anti-endotoxin activities similar to naturally-occurring BPI. We
report on a phase II open-label pilot study of rBPI-21 as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy in patients with complicated
intra-abdominal infections requiring surgical intervention. All patients received at least 3 days of combination antibiotic
therapy (ampicillin or vancomycin plus gentamicin, and metronidazole). Within 24 hours of beginning the antibiotic
regimen, rBPI-21 was initiated at sequential cohort doses of 0.5, 2.0, or 4.0 mg/kg/day IV x 3 days. Evaluations
included clinical response (cure, improvement, or fail) at Days 4 and 30, length of time until fever-free status, oral
feeding, clinical cure, and hospital discharge.

Results: Of 21 patients entered, 18 were evaluable for efficacy. Diagnoses included perforated appendicitis (12
patients), other perforations (4), liver abcess (1), and intra-abdominal pus (1). The number of days (median) to fever-free
was 7.5, 5.0, and 3.0 respectively for each cohort. There were no significant differences in days to oral feeding or
hospital discharge. At Day 4, patients assessed as cured or improved by treatment cohort gorup were 75% (6 of 8), 83%
(5 of 6), and 100% (4 of 4) respectively. Day 30 results were similar. Lipopolysaccharide bindng protein (LBP) levels
obtained for 16 patients were reduced relative to highly-elevated pre-treatment levels, which was consistent with the
favorable clinical response. There was a trend for LBP to decrease most rapidly in the high dose group. Only one
possibly related adverse event (rash and eye swelling) was observed.

Conclusion: Of the rBPI-21 doses administered in this sudy, rBPI-21 at 4.0 mg/kg/day led to the fastest time to
improvement in clinical response, fastest time to fever-free status, and greatest reduction in LBP. The anti-infective
activities of rBPI-21 may be clinically beneficial in this patient population.

(A copy of this poster may be obtained by calling XOMA Investor Relations at (800) BIO-XOMA (246-9662). If your
call is answered by voicemail, dial "1" for "Information Request". Please leave your name, mailing address, and the
specific poster or posters you wish to receive.)

c Copyright 1998, XOMA Corporation



To: Robert K. who wrote (7248)9/18/1998 1:03:00 PM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
Bob, talk about winning, check out the slgonzalez link to DARPA. Found this by going back to other parts of the site. Looks like XOMA could make a solid proposal. Note the interest in broad based counter measures rather than something that is effective against just a specific threat.

web-ext2.darpa.mil

"PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION:

The most sinister offensive biological warfare scenario employs surprise, immediate proximity, and rapidly lethal,
persistent agents in overwhelming quantities. Under these circumstances, real-time sensing, donning of physical
protection, and conventional non-medical countermeasures are only marginally effective. An effective operational
defense ideally requires instantly available or emplaced countermeasures that can defeat biological threats as they enter
the body and before they reach and attack target cells and tissues. The focus of this solicitation is the development of
revolutionary, broad spectrum, medical countermeasures against significantly pathogenic micro-organisms and/or their
pathogenic products. Protective measures should be able to eliminate biological threats, whether from natural sources or
modified through bio-engineering or other manipulation. Protective measures should also have the potential to protect
within or on the surfaces of the body and at the most common portals of entry (e.g., inhalation, ingestion,
trans-cutaneous). DARPA is not interested in protective measures against single biological threats or single pathogenic
products. DARPA seeks proposals that represent the highest potential for revolutionary breakthroughs in biotechnology
for this application, while recognizing that such opportunities often carry high risks. Funded research projects will be
strongly grounded in scientific and medical principles, yet revolutionary and forward thinking in scope and promise.
Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: (1) Strategies to broadly defeat a pathogen's ability to a) enter the
body b) traverse the bloodstream or lymphatics and c) enter target tissues; (2) Identification of novel pathogen
vulnerabilities based upon fundamental, critical molecular mechanisms of survival or pathogenesis (e.g., cellular
energetics, virulence modulation); (3) Unique, robust vehicles for the delivery of countermeasures into or within the
body; (4) Modulation of the advantageous and/or deleterious aspects of the immune response to significantly pathogenic
micro-organisms and/or their pathogenic products in the body; and (5) Decontamination of military personnel and
materiel. DARPA is planning to expand its efforts in the development of advanced pathogen countermeasures
technology in fiscal years 1999 through 2001. Therefore, we are seeking proposals for 1-3 years of funding. Several
parallel research and development projects are likely to be conducted. DARPA anticipates releasing additional BAAs in
Unconventional Pathogen Countermeasures as funding is made available. PRE-PROPOSAL: Proposers having the
technical and management capabilities, facilities, and experience necessary to conduct all or portions of this program are
invited to submit a brief pre-proposal describing their technical approach (including any preliminary data), major
technical challenges, participants, principal research topics and milestones, and approximate funding level versus time.
Teaming is strongly encouraged, as appropriate, but not a requirement for a successful selection. Submission of a
pre-proposal before the proposal is strongly encouraged. DARPA will encourage the bidders with the most promising
pre-proposals to submit complete Technical and Cost proposals for full evaluation. This initial screening is intended to
save bidders the time and expense of developing a detailed proposal that has little chance for award. DARPA will not
provide a de-brief of pre-proposals."



To: Robert K. who wrote (7248)9/18/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
Bob, since we don't even know if the DSMB has met or what they have said I obviously do not know if XOMA has any interest in this DARPA stuff nor do I know if DARPA would have any interest in anything XOMA could provide. Here is the FAQ section for DARPA. It should help anyone decide for themselves. I have decided but admit I am biased.

web-ext2.darpa.mil