Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Graystone who wrote (12487)	9/16/1998 2:27:00 AM
From: jpmac	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

Points taken. Though I confess I don't know what Canadians know about tawdry. I still think it is unfair, and perhaps incorrect, to assume that he used his position to gain favor. Then anyone, be they single or married, that had position, would not be able to have a relationship without it being considered that the position was the reason for the relationship. And, yes, Hilary has grounds for divorce. I think most states have no-fault divorce, however, which makes the question mute. Tawdry? If I had a relationship with someone I would be insulted to have it considered tawdry due to particular circumstances that did not fit someone's standards.